The MOA of ORENCIA
Clinical Trial Overview
orencia-clinical-trials/efficacy of ORENCIA
Safety and Tolerability
mtx inadequate responders
Page 7 of 7       
The Efficacy of ORENCIA® (abatacept)
Signs and Symptoms of RA

ORENCIA improved Disease Activity Scores (DAS28 <3.2
and DAS28 <2.6) in TNF inadequate responders through 2 years

  • Primary endpoints were ACR 20 at 6 months ORENCIA vs placebo
    (50.4% vs 19.5%, respectively; P<0.001) and improvement in HAQ-DI at 6 months (47.3% vs 23.3%, respectively; P<0.001)

Learn more about ATTAIN

Data are based on an as-observed analysis performed on data available at the visit of interest without imputation, ie, observed cases, including patients randomized to the ORENCIA group only.

Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 391 patients treated at baseline who had active RA despite anti-TNF therapy (389 included in efficacy analyses). Double-blind through 6 months, followed by an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension study. A total of 217 (from the original 256) patients in the group treated with ORENCIA entered the long-term extension study. Additional DMARDs, NSAIDs, and aspirin were added and/or adjusted at the discretion of the investigator in the long-term extension study. Primary reasons for discontinuation in the long-term extension study were adverse events and lack of efficacy.

In 5 clinical trials, the most serious adverse reactions were serious infections
(3% ORENCIA vs 1.9% placebo) and malignancies (1.3% ORENCIA vs 1.1% placebo). The most commonly reported acute infusion-related AEs (1%-2%) were dizziness, headache, and hypertension with fewer than 1% of patients discontinuing ORENCIA due to infusion-related events. For additional information see Safety link below.

NEXT: Safety

 

Home |  Privacy Policy |  Legal Notice |  Unsubscribe |  Contact Us |  Site Map
ORENCIA for Healthcare Professionals  |   ORENCIA Infusion  |   ORENCIA Materials  |   ORENCIA Reimbursement
                   
HAQ-DI